Lyons v. Moore et al, No. 1:2016cv00145 - Document 9 (E.D. Ark. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 2 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff Chandra Lyons' complaint is dismissed without prejudice. If Lyons wishes to continue this case, she is required to submit the filing and administrative fees of $400.00 to the Clerk of the Court within 30 days of the case's dismissal, along with a motion to reopen the case. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order or any judgment entered hereunder, would not be taken in good faith. The 6 Motion to Amend complaint is denied as futile. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/3/2016. (mcz)

Download PDF
Lyons v. Moore et al Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION CHANDRA LYONS ADC # 704518 V. PLAINTIFF NO: 1:16CV00145 JM MOORE et al DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris, and the objections filed.1 After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff Chandra Lyons’ complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If Lyons wishes to continue this case, she is required to submit the filing and administrative fees of $400.00 to the Clerk of the Court, noting the above case style number, within thirty (30) days of the case’s dismissal, along with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, this case will be reopened. 2. The Court additionally certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order or any judgment entered hereunder, would not be taken in good faith 1 The Court has reviewed docket numbers 3-5 and 7 and deems these pleadings to be objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. The motion to amend the complaint (docket 6) is DENIED as futile. Dockets.Justia.com DATED this 3rd day of November, 2016. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.