Burke v. Gatewood et al, No. 1:2016cv00113 - Document 7 (E.D. Ark. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 6 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 5 against all Defendants is dismissed for failure to state a claim. This dismissal counts as a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. I certify that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 10/17/2016. (mcz)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Burke v. Gatewood et al Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION STANLEY BURKE, ADC #151700 VS. PLAINTIFF 1:16-CV-00113-BRW-JTK GATEWOOD, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER I have received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney.1 No objections have been filed and the time for doing so has passed.2 After careful review. I adopt the Recommendation in its entirety as my findings in all respects. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint against Defendants (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. This dismissal counts as a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act.3 I certify that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith.4 IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of October, 2016. /s/ Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Doc. No. 6. 2 Objections were due Monday, October 17, 2016. 3 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 4 See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
