Clark v. Robertson et al, No. 1:2016cv00083 - Document 50 (E.D. Ark. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER adopting in their entirety 41 the findings and recommendations; granting 32 the motion to dismiss; dismissing defendants Correct Care Solutions and Shelia Armstrong; and denying 39 the motion for judgment on the pleadings submitted by defendants Clinton Baker, Thomas Finney, Johnny Morris, and Bradley Robertson. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/9/2017. (kdr)

Download PDF
Clark v. Robertson et al Doc. 50 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION SEYOUM ALI CLARK ADC # 120783 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 1:16-CV-00083 BSM BRADLEY HOWARD ROBERTSON, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 41] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris have been received. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the findings and recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 32] is granted, and defendants Correct Care Solutions and Shelia Armstrong are dismissed. The motion for judgment on the pleadings [Doc. No. 39] submitted by defendants Clinton Baker, Thomas Finney, Johnny Morris, and Bradley Robertson is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of May 2017. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.