Ivy v. Stone County Detention Center et al, No. 1:2015cv00061 - Document 9 (E.D. Ark. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER approving and adopting the 8 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's 2 complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; finding that dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/03/2015. (rhm)

Download PDF
Ivy v. Stone County Detention Center et al Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION ROBERT EARL IVY, ADC #650478 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 1:15-cv-00061-KGB/JTK STONE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 8). No objections have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful review, the Court approves and adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. It is, therefore, ordered that: 1. Plaintiff’s complaint against defendants is dismissed without prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. SO ORDERED this 3rd day of December, 2015. ______________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.