Johnson v. Richard et al, No. 1:2015cv00056 - Document 94 (E.D. Ark. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 93 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Defendants' 87 Motion to Compel is GRANTED; Defendants' 91 Motion for Sanctions is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 5/17/2016. (mcz)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Johnson v. Richard et al Doc. 94 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION WILBERT LEZELL JOHNSON v. PLAINTIFF 1:15CV00056-JM-JTK SHAWN RICHARD, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 87) be GRANTED. 2. Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 91) be GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff’s Complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of May, 2016. ______________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
