Johnson v. Richard et al, No. 1:2015cv00056 - Document 78 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 75 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; denying Plaintiff's 17 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; and denying Plaintiff's 69 Motion for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief, which this Court construes as a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 12/7/2015. (ljb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Johnson v. Richard et al Doc. 78 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION WILBERT LEZELL JOHNSON, ADC #84494 v. PLAINTIFF 1:15CV00056-JM-JTK RICHARD, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motions for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 17), and for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief, which this Court construes as a Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 69) are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of December, 2015. ______________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
