Murphy v. Kelly et al, No. 1:2015cv00044 - Document 5 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 4 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff's 2 complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 4/27/2015. (ks)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Murphy v. Kelly et al Doc. 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION LISA RYAN MURPHY ADC #760343 V. PLAINTIFF NO: 1:15CV00044 JM WENDY KELLY et al DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerry W. Cavaneau. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. This dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. DATED this 27th day of April, 2015. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
