Rodriguez v. Page et al, No. 1:2015cv00022 - Document 116 (E.D. Ark. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER adopting in their entirety the 112 proposed findings and recommendations; granting the 82 motion for summary judgment submitted by defendants Brenda Bridgeman and Melvin Nance; granting the 85 motion for summary judgment submitted by defendants Joseph Page and Aundrea Weekly; dismissing with prejudice Rodriguez's complaint; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/14/2017. (ljb)
Download PDF
Rodriguez v. Page et al Doc. 116 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION JUAN CARLOS RODRIGUEZ ADC #156405 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00022 BSM JOSEPH PAGE, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 112] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris have been received as well as plaintiff Juan Carlos Rodriguez’s objection [Doc. No. 115] thereto. After de novo review, the proposed findings and recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment submitted by defendants Brenda Bridgeman and Melvin Nance [Doc. No. 82] is granted, the motion for summary judgment submitted by defendants Joseph Page and Aundrea Weekly [Doc. No. 85] is granted, and Rodrigeuz’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice. It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of July 2017. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com