Lyons v. Williams et al, No. 1:2014cv00124 - Document 12 (E.D. Ark. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER approving and adopting 11 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; denying plaintiff Chandra Lyons's 6 7 10 motions to consolidate; denying Ms. Lyons's 3 application to proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing without prejudice this case; and certifying that an in form pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 05/27/2015. (rhm)

Download PDF
Lyons v. Williams et al Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION CHANDRA LYONS, ADC #704518 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 1:14-cv-00124 KGB/JTR B. WILLIAMS, McPherson Unit, ADC, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Dkt. No. 6). No objections have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. It is therefore ordered that: 1. The Court denies plaintiff Chandra Lyons’s motions to consolidate (Dkt. Nos. 6, 7, 2. The Court denies Ms. Lyons’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 3. The Court dismisses without prejudice this case. 4. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis 10). 3). appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED the 27th day of May, 2015. KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.