Murphy v. Holland et al, No. 1:2014cv00070 - Document 4 (E.D. Ark. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 3 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiffs 1 complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to pay the filing fee, failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5 (c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court's 2 order. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/27/2014. (ks)
Download PDF
Murphy v. Holland et al Doc. 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION LISA MURPHY, ADC #760343 v. PLAINTIFF No. 1:14CV00070 JLH HOLLAND, Correctional Officer, McPherson Unit; and THOMAS, Sergeant, McPherson Unit DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to pay the filing fee, failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court’s order. 2. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. DATED this 27th day of August, 2014. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com