Cody-Hassan v. Wiesenbach et al, No. 1:2014cv00049 - Document 8 (E.D. Ark. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 6 Proposed Findings and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the three strikes rule. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue this case, he should submit, within 30 days, the statutory filing fee of $400 to the Clerk. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 6/3/2014. (mcz)

Download PDF
Cody-Hassan v. Wiesenbach et al Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION STEPHEN CODY-HASSAN ADC # 146160 v. PLAINTIFF 1:14CV00049-JM-JJV WILLIAM WIESENBACH, JR.; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s Objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED. 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the three strikes rule set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue this case, he should submit within thirty (30) days of this Order: (a) the statutory filing fee of $400, in full, to the Clerk, noting the case style and number; and (b) a motion to reopen the case. 4. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 3rd day of June, 2014. ____________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.