Rushing v. Guy et al, No. 1:2014cv00028 - Document 95 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting in their entirety 87 Proposed Findings and Recommendations and denying 81 motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order, which this Court construes as a motion for preliminary injunction.
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Rushing v. Guy et al Doc. 95 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION RICKY LEE RUSHING ADC #65405 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 1:14-cv-00028-KGB-JTK WARDEN GUY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 87). There have been no objections, and the time for filing objections has passed. After a review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, it is therefore ordered that plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order, which this Court construes as a motion for preliminary injunction, is denied (Dkt. No. 81). SO ORDERED this the 8th day of June, 2015. ________________________________ KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
