McClure v. Weekly, No. 1:2013cv00086 - Document 18 (E.D. Ark. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 16 the proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Pr ison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); it is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/26/2014. (kdr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
McClure v. Weekly Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION SEAN R. MCCLURE v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 1:13CV00086 BSM WEEKLY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been received. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the proposed findings and recommendations should be, and hereby are, adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). DATED this 26th day of February 2014. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
