Sargent v. Corizon Medical Services Inc et al, No. 1:2012cv00127 - Document 8 (E.D. Ark. 2013)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. The motion for a temporary retraining order is denied as moot. The Court certifies that an ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/10/13. (kpr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION MARY ROSEALISA RING TILLERY SARGENT ADC #710323 V. PLAINTIFF Case No. 1:12-cv-127-KGB-JTR CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al. DEFENDANTS OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Mary Sargent has filed this pro se § 1983 action. On December 6, 2012, the Court gave Ms. Sargent 30 days to file an amended complaint containing information necessary to complete § 1915A screening (Dkt. No. 5). Importantly, the Court advised Ms. Sargent that if she failed to timely and properly do so, this case would be dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). As of today s date, Ms. Sargent has not filed her amended complaint and the time for doing so has expired. The case is dismissed without prejudice. The motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 2) is denied as moot. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED this 10th day of January, 2013. ________________________________ KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
