Valencia #124129 v. Shinn et al, No. 4:2021cv00335 - Document 24 (D. Ariz. 2022)

Court Description: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Court, after its independent review of the record, enter an order denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus 4 and denying the respondents' motion to strike th e addendum 20 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636 (b), any party may serve and file written objections within 14 days of being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. If objections are not timely filed, they may be deemed waived. The Local Rules permit a response to an objection. They do not permit a reply to a response without the permission of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 4/29/22. (See attached PDF for complete details)(JAM)

Download PDF
Dockets.Justia.com WO Valencia #124129 v. Shinn et al ex post facto Doc. 24 State v. Valencia Id. Id. Miller v. Alabama Montgomery v. Louisiana Id. ex post facto ex post facto Id. Id. Robinson v. Ignacio Woods v. Donald Id. Woods Id Id objectively Hibbler v. Benedetti ex post facto Gilman v. Brown facto ex post Watson v. Estelle Id. Id. Miller v. Alabama Id., Gilman v. Brown ex post facto See also less harsh Miller v. Alabama ex post facto Roper v. Simmons ex post facto ex post facto See Watson v. Estelle See Dobbert v. Florida called into doubt on another issue by Collins v. Youngblood see Miller v. Alabama Montgomery v. Louisiana. Miller Montgomery. Miller v. Alabama Id. Miller Montgomery v. Louisiana Miller Id. Montgomery Miller Id. Miller Miller Montgomery see Miller see also Jessup v. Shin Miller See

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.