Ferrell v. Ryan et al, No. 4:2013cv00305 - Document 33 (D. Ariz. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 29 . It is ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Final Judgment shall enter separately. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 9/22/14. (KAH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Ferrell v. Ryan et al Doc. 33 1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 6 Stanford Lamar Ferrell, 7 Petitioner, 8 vs. 9 Charles L. Ryan, et al., 10 Respondents. 11 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV-13-0305-TUC-DCB ORDER 12 Magistrate Judge Bowman issued her Report and Recommendation on July 22, 2014, 13 recommending that the District Court DENY the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 14 dismiss the action with prejudice. A copy was sent to all parties and Petitioner was granted 15 an extension of time to file objections. No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 16 Recommendation have been timely filed. Consequently, any objections that have not been 17 raised are waived and will not be addressed by the Court. 18 The Court, having made an independent review of the record, orders as follows: 19 IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Bowman’s Report and Recommendation 20 (Doc. 29) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and 21 conclusions of law. 22 23 24 IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Final Judgment shall enter separately. DATED this 22nd day of September, 2014. 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
