Lorenz et al v. Arizona, State of et al, No. 3:2013cv08139 - Document 20 (D. Ariz. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER AND OPINION granting in part and denying in part the 4 MOTION to Dismiss Case. 1) Plaintiffs' claims in Count One and Count Three are DISMISSED with prejudice. 2) Plaintiffs' claim in Count Two is hereby REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of Arizona. 3)The Clerk of Court will please enter judgment that Plaintiffs take nothing on Counts One and Three and remanding Count Two only to the Superior Court of the State of Arizona in and for the County of Apache. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 10/7/13. (Attachments: # 1 Copy of Remand Letter) (LAD)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA OFFICE OF THE CLERK BRIAN D. KARTH DEBRA LUCAS DISTRICT COURT EXECUTIVE / CLERK OF COURT SANDRA DAY O CONNOR U. S. COURTHOUSE, SUITE 130 401 WEST WASHINGTON STREET, SPC 1 PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85003-2118 CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK SANDRA DAY O CONNOR U. S. COURTHOUSE, SUITE 130 401 WEST WASHINGTON STREET, SPC 1 PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85003-2118 Visit our website at www.azd.uscourts.gov MICHAEL O'BRIEN CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK EVO A. DECONCINI U.S. COURTHOUSE 405 W. CONGRESS, SUITE 1500 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-5010 October 7, 2013 Clerk's Office Apache County Superior Court PO Box 365 St. Johns, AZ 85936 RE: REMAND TO APACHE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT District Court Case Number: CV-13-8139-PCT-JWS Superior Court Case Number: CV2013-087 Dear Clerk of Court: Enclosed is a certified copy of the Order entered in this Court on October 7, 2013, remanding the above case as to Count Two only to Apache County Superior Court for the State of Arizona. Sincerely, BRIAN D. KARTH, DCE/CLERK OF COURT S/L. Dixon L. Dixon, Deputy Clerk Enclosure cc: all counsel The staff of the Clerk s Office ensures the effective, efficient and professional delivery of clerical and administrative services, while fostering a customer-friendly and employee-friendly environment.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
