Coomes v. Arpaio et al, No. 2:2014cv01118 - Document 5 (D. Ariz. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER granting 2 Plaintiff's Application/Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee. The complaint is dismissed with 30 days leave to amend. Clerk must enter dismissal with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) if plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/10/14.(LSP)

Download PDF
Coomes v. Arpaio et al Doc. 5 1 2 MDR WO 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Timothy Wayne Coomes, 10 11 12 No. CV 14-1118-PHX-DGC (DKD) Plaintiff, vs. ORDER Joseph Arpaio, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Timothy Wayne Coomes, who is confined in the Maricopa County 16 Durango Jail, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint1 (Doc. 1) and an Application to 17 Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2). The Court will dismiss the Complaint with leave to 18 amend. 19 I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee 20 Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. 21 § 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 22 The Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of $23.81. The remainder of the fee will 23 be collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income credited to 24 Plaintiff’s trust account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. 25 26 27 28 1 In the Jurisdiction section of his Complaint, Plaintiff asserts that the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to “Graves v. Arpaio.” As discussed in more detail below, this is not a proper jurisdictional basis for a lawsuit. For purposes of this Order, the Court will construe Plaintiff’s Complaint as filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. However, if Plaintiff files an amended complaint, he must identify a proper basis for this Court’s jurisdiction over his claims. JDDL-K Dockets.Justia.com 1 § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a separate Order requiring the appropriate government 2 agency to collect and forward the fees according to the statutory formula. 3 II. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints 4 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief 5 against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 6 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff 7 has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon 8 which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is 9 immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). 10 A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the 11 pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 12 does not demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the- 13 defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” 14 (2009). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere 15 conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Id. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 16 “[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a 17 claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 18 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual 19 content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable 20 for the misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible 21 claim for relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw 22 on its judicial experience and common sense.” Id. at 679. Thus, although a plaintiff’s 23 specific factual allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must 24 assess whether there are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id. 25 at 681. 26 27 courts must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 28 JDDL-K But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, 342 (9th Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less -2- 1 stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. 2 Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam)). 3 If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other 4 facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal 5 of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). 6 Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim, but because it may 7 possibly be amended to state a claim, the Court will dismiss it with leave to amend. 8 III. Complaint 9 In his three-count Complaint, Plaintiff sues Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph 10 Arpaio, the Towers Jail, and the Durango Jail. In his Request for Relief, Plaintiff seeks 11 monetary damages. 12 IV. Failure to State a Claim 13 Although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 14 520-21 (1972), conclusory and vague allegations will not support a cause of action. Ivey 15 v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). Further, a 16 liberal interpretation of a civil rights complaint may not supply essential elements of the 17 claim that were not initially pled. Id. 18 19 In the “Jurisdiction” section of his Complaint, Plaintiff asserts that the Court has 20 jurisdiction pursuant to Graves v. Arpaio. With respect to any claim for monetary 21 damages, Graves v. Arpaio, CV 77-0479-PHX-NVW, provides no independent cause of 22 action. 23 damages, see Hiser v. Franklin, 94 F.3d 1287 (9th Cir. 1997), Plaintiff must demonstrate 24 some right of action and legal entitlement to the monetary damages he seeks. In a case 25 challenging the conditions of confinement of pretrial detainees, the most likely source of 26 a right to sue is 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has jurisdiction over such cases pursuant to 27 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a)(3). 28 JDDL-K A. .... Graves v. Arpaio Although the class action does not foreclose an individual complaint for -3- 1 2 However, as discussed in more detail below, even if Plaintiff had alleged that this case arose under § 1983, he has still failed to state a claim. 3 B. 4 Section 1983 provides a cause of action against persons acting under color of state 5 law who have violated rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and federal 6 law. 42 U.S.C. § 1983; see also Buckley v. City of Redding, 66 F.3d 188, 190 (9th Cir. 7 1995). Plaintiff has failed to allege any constitutional or federal law violations. Thus, the 8 Court will dismiss without prejudice Plaintiff’s Complaint because it fails to state a 9 claim. Failure to Allege the Violation of a Constitutional Right 10 C. 11 To state a valid claim under § 1983, plaintiffs must allege that they suffered a 12 specific injury as a result of specific conduct of a defendant and show an affirmative link 13 between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 14 371-72, 377 (1976). 15 therefore, a defendant’s position as the supervisor of persons who allegedly violated 16 Plaintiff’s constitutional rights does not impose liability. Monell v. New York City Dep’t 17 of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691-92 (1978); Hamilton v. Endell, 981 F.2d 1062, 1067 18 (9th Cir. 1992); Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989). “Because vicarious 19 liability is inapplicable to Bivens and § 1983 suits, a plaintiff must plead that each 20 Government-official defendant, through the official’s own individual actions, has 21 violated the Constitution.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 676. “A plaintiff must allege facts, not 22 simply conclusions, that show that an individual was personally involved in the 23 deprivation of his civil rights.” Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 24 1998). Defendant Arpaio There is no respondeat superior liability under § 1983, and 25 Plaintiff has not alleged that Defendant Arpaio personally participated in a 26 deprivation of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights, was aware of a deprivation and failed to 27 act, or formed policies that resulted in Plaintiff’s injuries. 28 JDDL-K -4- Plaintiff has made no 1 allegations at all against Defendant Arpaio. 2 prejudice Defendant Arpaio. Thus, the Court will dismiss without 3 D. 4 Defendants Towers Jail and Durango Jail are not a proper Defendants. Section 5 1983 imposes liability on any “person” who violates an individual’s federal rights while 6 acting under color of state law. Defendants Towers Jail and Durango Jail are buildings or 7 collections of buildings, neither is a person or legally created entity capable of being 8 sued. Therefore, the Court will dismiss Defendants Towers Jail and Durango Jail. 9 V. Improper Defendants Leave to Amend 10 For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to 11 state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a 12 first amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will 13 mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If 14 Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended 15 complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff. 16 Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First 17 Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its 18 entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original 19 Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count. 20 If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements 21 telling the Court: (1) the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated; (2) the name 22 of the Defendant who violated the right; (3) exactly what that Defendant did or failed to 23 do; (4) how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of 24 Plaintiff’s constitutional right; and (5) what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of 25 that Defendant’s conduct. See Rizzo, 423 U.S. at 371-72, 377. 26 27 Plaintiff fails to affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific 28 JDDL-K Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he names as a Defendant. If injury suffered by Plaintiff, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for -5- 1 failure to state a claim. 2 Defendants has violated a constitutional right are not acceptable and will be 3 dismissed. Conclusory allegations that a Defendant or group of 4 Plaintiff should take note that a pretrial detainee’s claim for unconstitutional 5 conditions of confinement arises from the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause 6 rather than from the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual 7 punishment. Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 535 and n.16 (1979). Nevertheless, the same 8 standards are applied, requiring proof that the defendant acted with deliberate 9 indifference. See Frost v. Agnos, 152 F.3d 1124, 1128 (9th Cir. 1998). 10 Deliberate indifference is a higher standard than negligence or lack of ordinary 11 due care for the prisoner’s safety. Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 835 (1994). To 12 state a claim of deliberate indifference, plaintiffs must meet a two-part test. “First, the 13 alleged constitutional deprivation must be, objectively, sufficiently serious”; and the 14 “official’s act or omission must result in the denial of the minimal civilized measure of 15 life’s necessities.” Id. at 834 (internal quotations omitted). Second, the prison official 16 must have a “sufficiently culpable state of mind,” i.e., he must act with “deliberate 17 indifference to inmate health or safety.” Id. (internal quotations omitted). In defining 18 “deliberate indifference” in this context, the Supreme Court has imposed a subjective 19 test: “the official must both be aware of facts from which the inference could be drawn 20 that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and he must also draw the inference.” Id. at 21 837 (emphasis added). 22 23 conditions amount to “punishment” without due process in violation of the Fourteenth 24 Amendment. Bell, 441 U.S. at 535. A jail or prison must provide prisoners with 25 “adequate food, clothing, shelter, sanitation, medical care, and personal safety.” 26 Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1237, 1246 (9th Cir. 1982). However, this does not mean that 27 federal courts can, or should, interfere whenever prisoners are inconvenienced or suffer 28 JDDL-K The specific inquiry with respect to pretrial detainees is whether the prison de minimis injuries. See Bell, 441 U.S. at 539 n.21 (noting that a de minimis level of -6- 1 imposition does not rise to a constitutional violation). 2 confinement rises to the level of a constitutional violation may depend, in part, on the 3 duration of an inmate’s exposure to that condition. See Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 4 1089 (9th Cir. 1996) (citing Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 686-87 (1978)). Whether a condition of 5 Plaintiff should take note that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments require 6 “only that prisoners receive food that is adequate to maintain health; it need not be tasty 7 or aesthetically pleasing. ‘The fact that the food occasionally contains foreign objects or 8 sometimes is served cold, while unpleasant, does not amount to a constitutional 9 deprivation.’” LeMaire v. Maass, 12 F.3d 1444, 1456 (9th Cir. 1993) (citation omitted) 10 (quoting Hamm v. DeKalb County, 774 F.2d 1567, 1575 (11th Cir. 1985)). An inmate 11 may, however, state a claim where he alleges that he is served meals with insufficient 12 calories for long periods of time. Id. 13 In addition, overcrowding alone does not violate the Eighth or Fourteenth 14 Amendments. Hoptowit, 682 F.2d at 1249. A plaintiff may, however, state a cognizable 15 claim where he or she alleges that overcrowding results in some unconstitutional 16 condition. See, e.g., Akao v. Shimoda, 832 F.2d 119, 120 (9th Cir. 1987) (reversing 17 district court’s dismissal of claim that overcrowding caused increased stress, tension, and 18 communicable diseases, and confrontations between inmates); see also Toussaint v. 19 Yockey, 722 F.2d 1490, 1492 (9th Cir. 1984) (constitutional violation may occur as a 20 result of overcrowded prison conditions causing increased violence, tension and 21 psychiatric problems). 22 23 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 24 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original 25 complaint as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised 26 in the original complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was dismissed without 27 prejudice is waived if it is not alleged in a first amended complaint. Lacey v. Maricopa 28 JDDL-K A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). -7- 1 VI. Warnings 2 A. 3 Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his 4 release. Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he 5 intends to pay the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to 6 comply may result in dismissal of this action. Release 7 B. 8 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with 9 Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion 10 for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in 11 dismissal of this action. Address Changes 12 C. 13 Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See 14 LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further 15 notice to Plaintiff. Copies 16 D. 17 Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff 18 fails to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the 19 dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 20 Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil 21 judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more 22 prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal 23 in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, 24 malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner 25 is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Possible “Strike” 26 27 If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including 28 JDDL-K E. these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 Possible Dismissal -8- 1 F.2d at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any 2 order of the Court). 3 IT IS ORDERED: 4 (1) Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is granted. 5 (2) As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government 6 agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing 7 fee of $23.81. 8 9 10 11 (3) The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. (4) If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of 12 Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with 13 prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 14 15 16 (5) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Dated this 10th day of June, 2014. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JDDL-K -9- Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona 1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment. 2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law. 3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury. 4. The Filing and Administrative Fees. The total fees for this action are $400.00 ($350.00 filing fee plus $50.00 administrative fee). If you are unable to immediately pay the fees, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the “Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions. 5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten. 6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $400 filing and administrative fees or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to: Revised 5/1/2013 1 Phoenix & Prescott Divisions: OR U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130 401 West Washington Street, SPC 10 Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119 Tucson Division: U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500 405 West Congress Street Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010 7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case. 8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis). Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form: I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed (month, day, year) to: this Name: Address: Attorney for Defendant(s) (Signature) 9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint, you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the court-approved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave (permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv 15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time. 10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint. Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial. 11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written pleading or motion. 2 12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form. HEADING: 1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing address on the lines provided. 2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line, write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1-A” at the bottom. 3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED” in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are seeking only injunctive relief. Part A. JURISDICTION: 1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of that authority. 2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights occurred. 3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2. Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS: You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2-B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2. Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION: You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page 5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages. 3 1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation of only one civil right per count. 2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,” you must identify the specific issue involved. 3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s) occurred, if possible. 4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights. 5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided. Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF: Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided. SIGNATURE: You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself. FINAL NOTE You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number the pages. 4 Name and Prisoner/Booking Number Place of Confinement Mailing Address City, State, Zip Code (Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA (Full Name of Plaintiff) Plaintiff, vs. (1) (Full Name of Defendant) (2) (3) (4) Defendant(s). G Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them. ) , ) ) ) ) CASE NO. ) (To be supplied by the Clerk) , ) ) , ) ) CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT , ) BY A PRISONER ) , ) G Original Complaint ) G First Amended Complaint ) G Second Amended Complaint A. JURISDICTION 1. 2. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to: G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983 G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). G Other: . Institution/city where violation occurred: . Revised 5/1/2013 1 550/555 B. DEFENDANTS 1. Name of first Defendant: . The first Defendant is employed as: at . (Position and Title) 2. (Institution) Name of second Defendant: . The second Defendant is employed as: at . (Position and Title) 3. (Institution) Name of third Defendant: . The third Defendant is employed as: at . (Position and Title) 4. (Institution) Name of fourth Defendant: at (Position and Title) . The fourth Defendant is employed as: . (Institution) If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page. C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS 1. Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner? 2. If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed? G Yes G No . Describe the previous lawsuits: a. First prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . b. Second prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . c. Third prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page. 2 D. CAUSE OF ACTION 1. COUNT I State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies: a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your institution? G Yes G No b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . 3 1. COUNT II State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies. a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your institution? G Yes G No b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . 4 1. COUNT III State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies. a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your institution? G Yes G No b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page. 5 E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF State the relief you are seeking: . I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on DATE SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF (Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or other person who helped prepare this complaint) (Signature of attorney, if any) (Attorney’s address & telephone number) ADDITIONAL PAGES All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. 6

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.