Baker v. D.A.R.A. II, Inc. et al, No. 2:2006cv02887 - Document 103 (D. Ariz. 2008)
Court Description: ORDER pursuant to 102 Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice; Plaintiff, Dixie Baker, be and hereby is awarded a final judgment against Defendant, Kenneth Presutti, in the amount of $180,000.00; Plaintiff's remaining claims against all other Defendants are dismissed with prejudice; the parties hereby shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 10/29/08. (REW, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Baker v. D.A.R.A. II, Inc. et al 1 Doc. 103 WO 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Dixie Baker, Plaintiff, v. D.A.R.A. II, INC., an Arizona corporation; Kenneth Presutti, an individual; Cyndee Presutti, an individual; Jesse Wintersteen and Dara Wintersteen, husband and wife; and Jeffrey Presutti, an individual. Defendants. ___________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: CV-06-2887-PHX-LOA ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE The parties hereto, having filed a Stipulation for Dismissal with prejudice, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: A. Plaintiff, Dixie Baker, be and hereby is awarded a final judgment against Defendant, Kenneth Presutti, in the amount of $180,000.00; B. Plaintiff’s remaining claims against all other Defendants are dismissed with prejudice; C. The parties hereby shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. DATED this 29th day of October, 2008. 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
