Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:2006cv01496 - Document 30 (D. Ariz. 2008)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER granting Pla's attorney's 26 Motion for Attorney Fees. Pla's attorney shall collect $ 8,729.35 in attorney's fees in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), and reimburse Pla $ 3,898.22, previously paid in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 09/16/08. (ESL)

Download PDF

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 Sonja L. Lewis, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social) ) Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. _________________________________ ) CIV-06-1496-PHX-SMM MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER 14 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff s attorney s Motion for Attorney s Fees Under 15 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (Doc. 26). The fees, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), come out of a 16 successful Social Security claimant s past due benefits, twenty-five percent of which were 17 withheld by the Commissioner for potential attorney fee payment. 18 Background 19 In July 2003, Plaintiff applied for disability benefits under Title II of the Social 20 Security Act. Following an initial appeal, an administrative law judge (ALJ) held a hearing 21 and issued a decision denying Plaintiff s claim. Plaintiff retained Counsel and sought Appeals 22 Council review. The Council denied review, and Plaintiff, represented by Counsel, sought 23 judicial review by filing the underlying action. The parties moved for summary judgment. On 24 July 11, 2007, this Court remanded the case for further agency proceedings. Counsel was 25 awarded $3,898.22 in attorney fees (and $350.00 in costs) under the Equal Access to Justice 26 Act (EAJA). On remand, an ALJ issued a favorable decision based on Plaintiff s July 2003 27 Title II disability application. The Commissioner issued a Notice of Award on June 21, 2008. 1 The Commissioner determined that Plaintiff was entitled to past-due benefits and advised 2 Plaintiff that 25%, or $8,729.35, of those past-due benefits was being withheld for potential 3 attorney fee payment1. Counsel now seeks $8,729.35 in attorney fees for her work before this 4 Court. She proposes to refund to Plaintiff the lesser amount of $3,898.22 that she previously 5 received in EAJA fees. Discussion 6 7 Section 206(b) provides: 10 Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant . . . who was represented before the court by an attorney, the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment. 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A). 11 A district court must review counsel s request for fees as an independent check to 12 assure that the contingency fee agreement will yield reasonable results in particular cases. 13 Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 807 (2002). Agreements for section 406(b) fees are not 14 enforceable to the extent that they provide for fees exceeding 25 percent of the past-due 15 benefits. Id. Within the 25-percent boundary, the attorney for the successful claimant must 16 show that the fee sought is reasonable for the services rendered. Id. Thus, in determining 17 the amount of fees to award counsel, the district court must determine whether the fees 18 sought by counsel from his client exceed the statutory limit and are consistent with his 19 agreement with his client but also reasonable in amount. 8 9 20 After careful consideration of the agreement and the amount requested, 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court GRANTS Plaintiff s 22 attorney s Motion for Attorney s Fees. (Doc. 26.) 23 24 25 26 1 Should the Court find Counsel s request reasonable, the Court should award the amount sought ($8,729.35) and order Counsel to reimburse Plaintiff the $3,898.22 Counsel was previously awarded in EAJA fees. 27 -2- 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff s attorney shall collect $ 8,729.35 in 2 attorney s fees in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), and reimburse Plaintiff $ 3,898.22, 3 previously paid in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).2 4 DATED this 16th day of September, 2008. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 25 26 This will result in an actual net payment by Plaintiff to her counsel under § 406(b) in the amount of $ 4,831.13, which the Court finds reasonable for the work done by Plaintiff s counsel and based on their agreement. 27 -3-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.