Barnes v. Gordy et al, No. 1:2021cv00361 - Document 9 (S.D. Ala. 2022)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and obey the Courts orders. The Court also finds that Barnes is not entitled to either a Certificate of Appealability or to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 01/27/2022. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff on 01/28/2022) (cjr)

Download PDF
Barnes v. Gordy et al Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION VICTOR CLAYE BARNES, AIS # 00313583, Petitioner, vs. CHRISTOPHER GORDY, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIV. ACT. NO. 1:21-cv-361-TFM-N MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On November 23, 2021, the Magistrate Judge entered a report and recommendation which recommends this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to comply with the court’s orders. See Doc. 8. No objections were filed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes dismissal of a complaint for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with a court order or the federal rules. Gratton v. Great Am. Commc’ns, 178 F.3d 1373, 1374 (11th Cir. 1999). Further, such a dismissal may be done on motion of the defendant or sua sponte as an inherent power of the court. Betty K Agencies, Ltd. v. M/V Monada, 432 F.3d 1333, 1337 (11th Cir. 2005). “[D]ismissal upon disregard of an order, especially where the litigant has been forewarned, generally is not an abuse of discretion.” Vil v. Perimeter Mortg. Funding Corp., 715 F. App’x 912, 915 (quoting Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 837 (11th Cir. 1989)). “[E]ven a non-lawyer should realize the peril to [his] case, when [he] . . . ignores numerous notices” and fails to comply with court orders. Anthony v. Marion Cty. Gen. Hosp., 617 F.2d 1164, 1169 (5th Cir. 1980); see also Moon, 863 F.2d at 837 (As a general rule, where a litigant has been forewarned, dismissal for failure to obey a court order is not an abuse of discretion.). Therefore, the Court Page 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com finds it appropriate to exercise its “inherent power” to “dismiss [Plaintiff’s claims] sua sponte for lack of prosecution.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630, 82 S. Ct. 1386, 8 L. Ed. 2d 734 (1962); see also Betty K Agencies, Ltd., 432 F.3d at 1337 (describing the judicial power to dismiss sua sponte for failure to comply with court orders). Since the filing of his original petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on June 25, 2021, 2021, there has been no additional action by the petitioner despite at least two orders from this Court to pay the filing fee or a motion to proceed in forma pauperis as well as amend the petition. See Docs. 6, 7. Accordingly, after due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and obey the Court’s orders. The Court also finds that Barnes is not entitled to either a Certificate of Appealability or to appeal in forma pauperis. Final judgment shall issue separately in accordance with this order and Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. DONE and ORDERED this 26th day of January, 2022. /s/Terry F. Moorer TERRY F. MOORER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.