Cellular South Real Estate v. City of Mobile, Alabama, No. 1:2015cv00387 - Document 34 (S.D. Ala. 2016)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant as to Count 1 of Plaintiff's complaint and in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff as to Count 2. Defendant is, there fore, ORDERED to approve Plaintiff's application to build a cellular tower at the stadium site location. Plaintiff's Count 2 claim is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Costs are taxed against Defendant. Signed by Senior Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 7/8/2016. (mab)

Download PDF
Cellular South Real Estate v. City of Mobile, Alabama Doc. 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION CELLULAR SOUTH REAL ESTATE, ) INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA, ) ) Defendant. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-00387-CG-B FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Order entered this date granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granting in part and denying in part Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant as to Count 1 of Plaintiff’s complaint and in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff as to Count 2. Defendant is, therefore, ORDERED to approve Plaintiff’s application to build a cellular tower at the stadium site location. Plaintiff’s Count 2 claim is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Costs are taxed against Defendant. DONE this 8th day of July, 2016. /s/ Callie V. S. Granade SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.