Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Maclay Construction, Inc. et al, No. 1:2011cv00186 - Document 28 (S.D. Ala. 2011)

Court Description: JUDGMENT entered in accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the plaintiff shall have and recover from the defendants the sum of $286,074.91, with post-judgment inter est due to accrue on same at the rate of 0.11% from todays date. Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendants Maclay Construction, Inc. and Charles A. Maclay. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 12/20/2011. (eec)

Download PDF
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Maclay Construction, Inc. et al Doc. 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., : Plaintiff, : vs. : MACLAY CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al., CA 11-0186-C : : Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the plaintiff shall have and recover from the defendants the sum of $286,074.91, with postjudgment interest due to accrue on same at the rate of 0.11% from today’s date. Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendants Maclay Construction, Inc. and Charles A. Maclay. DONE this the 20th day of December, 2011. s/WILLIAM E. CASSADY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.