Vision Bank v. FP Management, LLC et al, No. 1:2011cv00003 - Document 46 (S.D. Ala. 2012)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT entered in favor of Vision Bank against FP Management, LLC, Mobile Midtown Property Management, LLC, Mobile Providence Property Management, LLC, WB Property Management, LLC, John F. Campbell in the total amount of $26,282.79. Pos t-judgment interest is imposed pursuant to 28:1961, and shall accrue at 0.12 percent from the date of judgment is entered on the docket until this judgment is paid. Count Three of plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 01/31/2012. (mab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Vision Bank v. FP Management, LLC et al Doc. 46 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION VISION BANK, Plaintiff, vs. FP MANAGEMENT, LLC, JOHN F. CAMPBELL, MOBILE MIDTOWN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC, WB PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC, and MOBILE PROVIDENCE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-0003-CG-N FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the court=s order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as to Counts One and Two of the plaintiff complaint entered on December 13, 2011 (Doc. 39), it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that JUDGMENT be and is hereby entered in favor plaintiff, Vision Bank, against defendants, FP Management, LLC, John F. Campbell, Mobile Midtown Property Management, LLC, WB Property Management, LLC, and Mobile Providence Property Management, LLC, in the total amount of $26,282.79, consisting of $12,179.26 in principal, $336.53 in accrued and unpaid interest, and $100.00 in late charges, and attorneys’ fees and costs in the total amount of $13,667.00. Post-judgment interest is imposed pursuant to Title 28 USC § 1961, and shall accrue at .12 percent (0.12%) from the date this judgment is entered on the docket until this judgment is paid. Dockets.Justia.com It is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Count Three of the plaintiff’s complaint against the aforementioned defendants is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to the Court’s order issued on December 23, 2011 (Doc. 42). DONE and ORDERED this 31st day of January, 2012. /s/ Callie V. S. Granade UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
