Shropshire v. Toney et al, No. 1:2010cv00470 - Document 107 (S.D. Ala. 2015)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT. In accordance with the Court's order dated November 10, 2014, granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant Deborah Toney and partial summary judgment in favor of Defendant Chandra Johnson: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff recove r nothing on his claim based on deliberate indifference to serious medical needs and that this claim be dismissed on the merits. On January 12, 2015, this action came before the Court for a trial without a jury on Plaintiff's remaining claim aga inst Defendant Chandra Johnson and the following decision was reached: It is ORDERED that the Plaintiff, Donnie Shropshire, recover of the Defendant, Chandra Johnson the amount of $2,000, along with costs. Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Butler, Jr on 1/21/2015. copies to parties. (sdb)

Download PDF
Shropshire v. Toney et al Doc. 107 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION DONNIE SHROPSHIRE, Plaintiff v. DEBORAH TONEY and CHANDRA JOHNSON, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-­ 00470-­ CB-­ N FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Court’s order dated November 10, 2014, granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant Deborah Toney and partial summary judgment in favor of Defendant Chandra Johnson: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff recover nothing on his claim based on deliberate indifference to serious medical needs and that this claim be dismissed on the merits. On January 12, 2015, this action came before the Court for a trial without a jury on Plaintiff’s remaining claim against Defendant Chandra Johnson and the following decision was reached: It is ORDERED that the Plaintiff, Donnie Shropshire, recover of the Defendant, Chandra Johnson the amount of $2,000, along with costs. DONE this the 21st day of January, 2015. s/Charles R. Butler, Jr. Senior United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.