Love v. City Of Mobile et al, No. 1:2010cv00166 - Document 156 (S.D. Ala. 2011)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT entered in favor of City Of Mobile, Kevin Rodgers, Officer Bryan Mims, Officer Carlos Walton, Officer Clay Godwin, Officer Harry Milbrath, Officer Joe Cotner against Antonio Love. Plaintiff's claims against said defendants DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Cost of aforementioned defendants are to be taxed against the plaintiff. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 8/29/2011. (mab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Love v. City Of Mobile et al Doc. 156 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ANTONIO LOVE, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF MOBILE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-0166-CG-C FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the court=s memorandum opinion and order entered on June 2, 2011 (Doc. 136), and the memorandum opinion and order entered this date, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that JUDGMENT be and is hereby entered in favor defendants, City of Mobile, Harry Milbrath, Bryan Mims, Carlos Walton, Clay Godwin, Joe Cotner and Kevin Rodgers, and against plaintiff, Antonio Love.1 Therefore, plaintiff’s claims against said defendants are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Costs of the aforementioned defendants are to be taxed against the plaintiff. DONE and ORDERED this 29th day of August, 2011. /s/ Callie V. S. Granade UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1The court notes that plaintiff’s claims against defendants, White-Spunner & Associates, Inc. and Azalea Center, LLC, were dismissed without prejudice on stipulation of the parties (Doc. 60) as of November 2, 2010 by order dated October 27, 2010 (Doc. 64); that plaintiff’s claims against defendants, Officer David Fenner and Officer Albert Priselac, were dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal (Doc. 77) by order dated December 8, 2010 (Doc. 78); and that plaintiff’s claims against defendants, Dollar General Corporation and Kenneth Gooden, were dismiss with prejudice pursuant to the parties’ joint motion to dismiss (Doc. 151) by order dated August 9, 2011 (Doc. 153). Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
