Medina v. Neely, No. 7:2023cv01135 - Document 11 (N.D. Ala. 2024)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION: The Court adopts the magistrate judge's findings and accepts his recommendation. By separate order, the Court will dismiss this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 5/31/2024. (DNW)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Medina v. Neely Doc. 11 FILED 2024 May-31 AM 08:36 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION NATIVIDA MERCADO MEDINA, Petitioner, v. WARDEN K. NEELY, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 7:23-cv-01135-MHH-NAD MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner Nativida Mercado Medina filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1). On May 7, 2024, the magistrate judge entered a report in which he recommended that the Court dismiss this habeas petition with prejudice. (Doc. 10). The magistrate judge advised the parties of their right to file objections to the report and recommendation within 14 days. (Doc. 10 at 7-8). The Court has not received objections. Having reviewed the materials in the Court’s electronic docket, including the report and recommendation, the Court adopts the magistrate judge’s findings and accepts his recommendation. By separate order, the Court will dismiss this action with prejudice. Dockets.Justia.com DONE and ORDERED this May 31, 2024. _________________________________ MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
