Howard v. Alabama, State of, No. 7:2021cv01599 - Document 43 (N.D. Ala. 2022)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION - After careful consideration of the record in this case and the Magistrate Judge's report, the court ADOPTS the report and ACCEPTS the recommendation. A final judgment will be entered. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 12/1/2022. (MEB2)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Howard v. Alabama, State of Doc. 43 FILED 2022 Dec-01 PM 12:36 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION GAVIN HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 7:21-cv-1599-LSC-GMB MEMORANDUM OPINION The Magistrate Judge entered a report on November 9, 2022 recommending the dismissal of this action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Doc. 42. Although the Magistrate Judge advised the plaintiff of his right to file written objections within 14 days, the court has not received any objections. After careful consideration of the record in this case and the Magistrate Judge’s report, the court ADOPTS the report and ACCEPTS the recommendation. Consistent with that recommendation and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), this action is due to be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. A final judgment will be entered. Dockets.Justia.com DONE and ORDERED on December 1, 2022. _____________________________ L. Scott Coogler United States District Judge 160704 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
