Meyers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al, No. 7:2020cv00967 - Document 7 (N.D. Ala. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION - After a de novo review of the entire file in this action, including the report and recommendation, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judges report and ACCEPTS his recommendation. The court WILL DENY Ms. Meyers' § 2241 petition and WILL DISMISS this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 10/14/2020. (KEK)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Meyers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al Doc. 7 FILED 2020 Oct-14 PM 04:08 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION JULIA HOLLIS MEYERS, Petitioner, v. CHAD GARRETT, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 7:20-cv-967-ACA-GMB MEMORANDUM OPINION On September 15, 2020, the magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation, recommending that the court deny Julia Hollis Meyers’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 6). The magistrate judge advised the parties of their right to file objections to the report and recommendation within 14 days, but the court has not received any timely objections. After a de novo review of the entire file in this action, including the report and recommendation, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s report and ACCEPTS his recommendation. The court WILL DENY Ms. Meyers’ § 2241 petition and WILL DISMISS this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The court will enter a separate final order. DONE and ORDERED this October 14, 2020. _________________________________ ANNEMARIE CARNEY AXON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
