Mims v. Corizon, LLC (INMATE 1)(CONSENT), No. 7:2019cv02065 - Document 63 (N.D. Ala. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION - As Judge Ott explained, Mr. Mims has not stated a claim against Corizon, and Mr. Mims already has dismissed his claims against the other defendants in this action, (Doc. 38 ). Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915 A(b), by separate order, the Court will dismiss Mr. Mims's claims against Corizon without prejudice. Because all of Mr. Mims's claims against the defendants now have been resolved, by separate order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 6/24/2020. (KEK)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Mims v. Corizon, LLC (INMATE 1)(CONSENT) Doc. 63 FILED 2020 Jun-24 AM 08:58 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION TIMOTHY MIMS, Plaintiff, v. CORIZON, LLC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 7:19-cv-02065-MHH-JEO MEMORANDUM OPINION On May 13, 2020, the magistrate judge filed a report in which he recommended that the Court dismiss this action against Corizon, LLC without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) because Mr. Mims has not stated a claim against Corizon upon which relief can be granted. (Doc. 62). The magistrate judge advised Mr. Mims of his right to file specific written objections within 14 days. (Doc. 62, p. 6). The Court has not received objections from Mr. Mims. A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Having reviewed and considered the relevant materials in the court record, including the report and recommendation, the Court adopts the magistrate judge’s report and accepts his recommendation. As Judge Ott explained, Mr. Mims has not stated a claim against Corizon, and Mr. Mims already has dismissed his claims against the Dockets.Justia.com other defendants in this action, (Doc. 38). Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), by separate order, the Court will dismiss Mr. Mims’s claims against Corizon without prejudice. Because all of Mr. Mims’s claims against the defendants now have been resolved, by separate order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. DONE and ORDERED this June 24, 2020. _________________________________ MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
