Smith v. Washington-Adduci, No. 7:2016cv00184 - Document 28 (N.D. Ala. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment; On March 5, 2018, the magistrate judge reported that the plaintiff had timely filed her FTCA claims against the defendant and recommend the motion for summary judgment be den ied, 25 ; No objections have been received by the court; After carefully reviewing all the materials in the court, the magistrate judge's report is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED; The court ORDERS that the defendant's motion for summary judgment, 21 , is DENIED; The plaintiff's FTCA claims against the defendant are REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 3/21/2018. (KBB)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Smith v. Washington-Adduci Doc. 28 FILED 2018 Mar-21 AM 09:18 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION MICHELLE DENISE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 7:16-cv-00184-AKK-JHE ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On March 5, 2018, the magistrate judge reported that the plaintiff had timely filed her FTCA claims against the defendant and thus recommended the defendant’s motion for summary judgment be denied. Doc. 25. Although the parties were advised of their right to file specific written objections within fourteen days, no objections have been received by the court. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge’s report is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the court ORDERS that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, doc. 21, is DENIED. The plaintiff’s FTCA claims against the defendant are REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE the 21st day of March, 2018. Dockets.Justia.com _________________________________ ABDUL K. KALLON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
