Wallace v. Hammontree et al, No. 7:2014cv01756 - Document 13 (N.D. Ala. 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OF OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 1/5/2015. (AVC)

Download PDF
Wallace v. Hammontree et al Doc. 13 FILED 2015 Jan-05 PM 03:29 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION GILBERT J. WALLACE, Plaintiff, v. Dr. LEE HAMMONTREE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 7:14-cv-01756-RDP-TMP MEMORANDUM OF OPINION The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on November 25, 2014, recommending that the federal claims in this action be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge further recommended that any state law claims asserted in the complaint be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). Although Plaintiff was advised of his right to file specific written objections within fourteen days, and was granted fourteen additional days on December 12, 2014, he has failed to respond to the Report and Recommendation. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the Report and Recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge’s Report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is Dockets.Justia.com ACCEPTED. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), the federal claims in this action are due to be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Additionally, any state law claims asserted in the complaint are due to be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). A Final Judgment will be entered contemporaneously herewith. DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of January, 2015. ___________________________________ R. DAVID PROCTOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.