Lee v. Holland et al, No. 7:2012cv03855 - Document 15 (N.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 1/14/15. (SAC )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lee v. Holland et al Doc. 15 FILED 2015 Jan-14 PM 01:16 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION DEMETRIUS LAMAR LEE, Petitioner, vs. HOLLAND, Chief, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 7:12-cv-03855-WMA-TMP MEMORANDUM OPINION On January 5, 2015, the magistrate judge filed his Report and Recommendation in the above-styled cause, recommending that this petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed without prejudice. Demetrius Lamar Lee (“Petitioner”) was given time to object to the Report and Recommendation. On January 12, 2015, Petitioner’s copy of the Report and Recommendation was returned to the court marked “Return to Sender; Unable to Forward.” (Doc. 14). Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the Report and Recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be ADOPTED, and the recommendation ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the above-styled cause is due to be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Dockets.Justia.com DONE this 14th day of January, 2015. _____________________________ WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
