Reno v. Strange et al, No. 7:2012cv02534 - Document 8 (N.D. Ala. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OF OPINION-re: R&R 6 . The court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Signed by Judge Robert B Propst on 3/27/2013. (AVC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
FILED 2013 Mar-27 AM 08:51 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION LARRY EARL RENO, Plaintiff, v. LUTHER STRANGE and BART HARMON, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 7:12-cv-02534-RBP-JEO MEMORANDUM OF OPINION The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on February 6, 2013, recommending that this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The plaintiff filed objections to the report and recommendation on February 15, 2013, essentially restating the arguments made in his initial complaint. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation and the objections thereto, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the complaint is due to be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. A Final Judgment will be entered. DATED this 27th day of March, 2013. ROBERT B. PROPST SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
