Haag v. Cullman County Detention Center, No. 5:2019cv01055 - Document 11 (N.D. Ala. 2019)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge's report is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), this action is due to be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. A Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 12/20/2019. (SRD)

Download PDF
Haag v. Cullman County Detention Center Doc. 11 FILED 2019 Dec-20 PM 12:56 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION STEPHEN ANTHONY HAAG, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CULLMAN COUNTY DETENTION ) ) CENTER, ) ) Defendant. Case No. 5:19-cv-01055-CLM-JEO MEMORANDUM OPINION The magistrate judge filed a report on September 18, 2019, recommending this action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. Although the magistrate judge advised the plaintiff of his right to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days, no objections have been received by the court and the plaintiff has not provided the court with his current address. 1 Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge’s report is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, in 1 The Report and Recommendation was returned to the Clerk of the Court as “undeliverable.” (Doc. 10). Dockets.Justia.com accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), this action is due to be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. A Final Judgment will be entered. DONE and ORDERED this 20th day of December, 2019. _________________________________ COREY L. MAZE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.