Van Hoozer v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner, No. 5:2017cv01306 - Document 19 (N.D. Ala. 2018)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE that claimant's objections are OVERRULED; the magistrate judge's report is ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED and the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED with costs taxed to claimant as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 7/16/2018. (AHI)

Download PDF
Van Hoozer v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner Doc. 19 FILED 2018 Jul-16 AM 10:14 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION JENNIFER VAN HOOZER, Claimant, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 5:17-cv-1306-CLS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The magistrate judge filed a report on June 15, 2018, recommending that this court should affirm the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration to deny claimant’s claim for supplemental security income benefits.1 Claimant filed objections to the report and recommendation,2 and the Commissioner filed a reply to claimant’s objections.3 Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court concludes that the Commissioner’s decision was supported by substantial evidence and in accordance with applicable legal standards. Accordingly, claimant’s objections are 1 Doc. no. 15 (Report and Recommendation). 2 Doc. no. 16. 3 Doc. no. 18. Dockets.Justia.com OVERRULED. The magistrate judge’s report is hereby ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. Costs are taxed against claimant. The Clerk is directed to close this file. DONE this 16th day of July, 2018. ______________________________ United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.