Campbell v. Davis et al, No. 5:2016cv01275 - Document 32 (N.D. Ala. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 9/13/2017. (PSM)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Campbell v. Davis et al Doc. 32 FILED 2017 Sep-13 AM 10:44 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER CAMPBELL, AIS# 294171 Plaintiff, v. CHRISTEEN DAVIS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:16-cv-01275-LSC-JEO MEMORANDUM OPINION The magistrate judge filed a report on July 31, 2017, recommending that the defendants’ special reports be treated as motions for summary judgment and further recommending that the motions be granted. (Doc. 31). Although the parties were advised of their right to file specific written objections within fourteen days, no objections have been received by the court. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge’s report is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the court ORDERS that the defendants’ motions for summary judgment (docs. 15 and 28) are GRANTED, the court finding no genuine issues of material fact exist and the defendants are entitled to judgment in their favor as a matter of law. To the extent the plaintiff’s amended complaint raises a state law claim of medical Dockets.Justia.com malpractice, the court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(1). DONE and ORDERED on September 13, 2017. _____________________________ L. Scott Coogler United States District Judge 160704 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
