Anderson v. Alabama, State of, No. 5:2013cv02008 - Document 11 (N.D. Ala. 2014)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION, as set out, re Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 10 . The Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's findings are due to be and are hereby ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. As a result, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is due to be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn on 7/14/14. (CTS, )
FILED 2014 Jul-14 AM 10:36 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION LAMAR WALLACE ANDERSON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF ALABAMA, Respondent. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-cv-2008-SLB-JEO MEMORANDUM OPINION This is a case on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by Lamar Wallace Anderson, an Alabama state prisoner acting pro se. The magistrate judge filed findings and a recommendation that the petition is due to be dismissed without prejudice to allow Anderson to exhaust his available state remedies. (Doc. 10). No objections have been filed. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the findings and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge s findings are due to be and are hereby ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. As a result, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is due to be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A Final Judgment will be entered. DONE this the 14th day of July, 2014. SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Terms of Service