-HGD Whatley v. United States of America, No. 5:2011cv08024 - Document 7 (N.D. Ala. 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that the court is of the opinion that theMagistrate Judge's report and recommendation is ADOPTED and it is ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence is DENIED; as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 7/16/2012. (AHI )

Download PDF
FILED 2012 Jul-16 AM 10:34 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION JAHMAL AHMAD WHATLEY, Petitioner, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. CV-11-S-8024-NE ORDER Magistrate Judge Harwell Davis entered a Report on June 21, 2012, recommending that petitioner s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition be denied.1 The parties were allowed fourteen days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge.2 The copy of the report and recommendation mailed to petitioner at his last known address was returned to the court as undeliverable, marked Return to Sender Not Here. 3 The Federal Bureau of Prisons website shows that petitioner was released from prison on October 21, 2011.4 To date, petitioner has neither provided the court with an updated address, nor filed objections to the report and recommendation. 1 Doc. no. 5 (Report and Recommendation). 2 See id. at 4. 3 See doc. no. 6 (Returned Mail). 4 See Federal Bureau of Prisons, http://www.bop.gov/iloc2/LocateInmate.jsp. Inmate Locator, available at Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo the record and the Magistrate Judge s report and recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge s report and recommendation is due to be, and it hereby is, ADOPTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is due to be, and it hereby is, DENIED. The Clerk is directed to close this file. DONE this 16th day of July, 2012. ______________________________ United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.