Blankenship v. Bates et al, No. 5:2011cv03875 - Document 23 (N.D. Ala. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 07/01/2013. (MSN)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Blankenship v. Bates et al Doc. 23 FILED 2013 Jul-01 AM 10:44 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION PAUL THOMAS BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiff, vs. Dr. JOHNNY E. BATES, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:11-cv-03875-LSC-JHE MEMORANDUM OF OPINION The magistrate judge filed a report on June 7, 2013, recommending that the defendants' special report be treated as a motion for summary judgment and, as such, that the motion be granted and this action dismissed with prejudice. No objections have been filed by any party. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. The Court EXPRESSLY FINDS that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment is due to be GRANTED and this action is due to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Final Judgment will be entered. Dockets.Justia.com Done this 1st day of July 2013. L. Scott Coogler United States District Judge [160704] 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
