Neufville v. DHS/ICE et al, No. 4:2019cv01159 - Document 14 (N.D. Ala. 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge's report is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), this action is due to be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. The plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order (doc. 4) is due to be deemed MOOT. A Final Order will be entered. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 12/20/2019. (SRD, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Neufville v. DHS/ICE et al Doc. 14 FILED 2019 Dec-20 PM 01:51 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION JERMAINE NEUFVILLE, Plaintiff, v. DHS/ICE and JONATHON HORTON, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:19-cv-01159-CLM-JHE MEMORANDUM OPINION The magistrate judge filed a report on November 18, 2019, recommending this action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. (Doc. 12). Although the magistrate judge advised the plaintiff of his right to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days, no objections or other response has been received by the court. In fact, the United States Postal Service returned the plaintiff’s copy of the report and recommendation as undeliverable. (Doc. 13). Handwritten on the returned envelope is the notation, “Released 11/02/09.” (Id.). The plaintiff has not provided the court with his current address, even though a provision of his signed complaint reads: “I agree to provide the Clerk’s Office with any changes to my address where case-related papers may be served. I understand that my failure to keep a current address on file with the Clerk’s Office may result in the dismissal of my case.” (Doc. 2 at 11). 1 Dockets.Justia.com Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge’s report is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), this action is due to be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. The plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order (doc. 4) is due to be deemed MOOT. A Final Order will be entered. DONE and ORDERED this 20th day of December 2019. _________________________________ COREY L. MAZE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
