Rush v. Wright et al, No. 4:2016cv02056 - Document 12 (N.D. Ala. 2018)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 9/12/2018. (KAM)
Download PDF
Rush v. Wright et al Doc. 12 FILED 2018 Sep-12 PM 12:04 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION CAREN GAYLE RUSH, Petitioner, v. WARDEN DEDRIA WRIGHT, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 4:16-cv-02056-LSC-JHE MEMORANDUM OPINION On August 14, 2018, the magistrate judge entered a Report and Recommendation, (doc. 11), recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed with prejudice. No objections have been filed. The court has considered the entire file in this action, together with the report and recommendation, and has reached an independent conclusion that the report and recommendation is due to be adopted and approved. Accordingly, the court hereby adopts and approves the findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge as the findings and conclusions of this court. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is due to be DISMISSED. A separate Order will be entered. This Court may issue a certificate of appealability “only if the applicant has a made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). To make such a showing, a “petitioner must demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong,” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000), or that “the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003) (internal quotations omitted). This Court finds Petitioner’s claims do not satisfy either standard. Dockets.Justia.com DONE and ORDERED on September 12, 2018. _____________________________ L. Scott Coogler United States District Judge 160704 2