Andrews v. Satterfield et al, No. 4:2013cv00942 - Document 20 (N.D. Ala. 2014)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 5/14/2014. (AVC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
FILED 2014 May-14 PM 04:06 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION CHURCHILL ANDREWS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. SCOTT SATTERFIELD; and SCOTT HASSELL, Warden; Respondents. Case No. 2:13-CV-942-RDP-TMP MEMORANDUM OPINION On April 29, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation in the abovestyled cause, recommending that this petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 be denied and dismissed as moot. (Doc. 18). To date, no objections have been filed by either party. The Report and Recommendation mailed to Petitioner has been returned as undeliverable, and marked that he is no longer here. Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the Report and Recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the Report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, and the Recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the above-styled cause is due to be denied and dismissed. A separate order will be entered herewith. DONE and ORDERED this 14th day of May, 2014. ___________________________________ R. DAVID PROCTOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
