Surles v. Bell, No. 2:2023cv00724 - Document 12 (N.D. Ala. 2024)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION: The court therefore ADOPTS the report and ACCEPTS the recommendation. Consistent with that recommendation and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), the court WILL DISMISS this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 4/24/2024. (DNW)

Download PDF
Surles v. Bell Doc. 12 FILED 2024 Apr-24 PM 02:38 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER SURLES, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. MR. BELL, Defendant. Case No. 2:23-cv-00724-ACA-JHE MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Christopher Surles has filed a pro se complaint seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of his civil rights. (Doc. 1). The magistrate judge entered a report on March 29, 2024, recommending the court dismiss this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) as frivolous and for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 11). Although the magistrate judge advised Mr. Surles of his right to file written objections within fourteen days, the court has not received any objections. Mr. Surles’s failure to file specific objections waives any challenge to the proposed findings and recommendations. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); 11th Cir. R. 31. In the light of the proposed findings, the court agrees with the proposed recommendation. The court therefore ADOPTS the report and ACCEPTS the recommendation. Consistent with that recommendation and 28 U.S.C. Dockets.Justia.com § 1915A(b)(1), the court WILL DISMISS this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. A final judgment will be entered. DONE and ORDERED this April 24, 2024. _________________________________ ANNEMARIE CARNEY AXON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.