Files v. Giddens et al, No. 2:2020cv00959 - Document 4 (N.D. Ala. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION-Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court concludes that the magistrate judges Report and Recommendation is due to be adopted. A separate order will be entered. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 08/10/2020. (AKD)

Download PDF
Files v. Giddens et al Doc. 4 FILED 2020 Aug-10 AM 09:51 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION EARNEST JAMES FILES, JR., Plaintiff, v. STEVEN DALES GIDDENS, et. al., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action Number 2:20-cv-00959-AKK-HNJ Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The magistrate judge filed a report on July 17, 2020, recommending that Plaintiff Earnest Files’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that his complaint be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Doc. 3. Although Files was advised of his right to file specific objections within fourteen days, no objections have been received by the court. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court concludes that the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is due to be adopted. A separate order will be entered. DONE the 10th day of August, 2020. _________________________________ ABDUL K. KALLON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.