Mosley v. Ellington et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2020cv00547 - Document 44 (N.D. Ala. 2022)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION: The Court ADOPTS the report and ACCEPTS the recommendation and GRANTS the defendants' 36 , 38 Motions for Summary Judgment, as more fully set out therein. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 3/3/2022. (AHI)

Download PDF

Mosley v. Ellington et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 44 FILED 2022 Mar-03 PM 01:14 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION TERRANCE LORENZO MOSLEY, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD ELLINGTON, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:20-cv-00547-LCB-NAD MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Terrance Lorenzo Mosley filed a pro se complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of his rights under the Constitution or laws of the United States. (Doc. 1). On February 7, 2022, the magistrate judge entered a report recommending the court grant the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, (Docs. 36 & 38), and dismiss Mosley’s complaint with prejudice. (Doc. 43). Although the parties were advised of their right to file specific written objections within 14 days, the court has not received any objections. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s report and ACCEPTS his recommendation. Accordingly, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, (Docs. 36 & 38), is due to be GRANTED, the court finding no genuine issues of material fact exist. Dockets.Justia.com The court will enter a separate Final Judgment. DONE and ORDERED this March 3, 2022. _________________________________ LILES C. BURKE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.