Hudson v. Gordy et al, No. 2:2019cv00968 - Document 21 (N.D. Ala. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER- The magistrate judge's report is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED; The court ORDERS that the defts' motion for summary judgment (Doc 17 ) is GRANTED as to the pltf's claims against defts Teague , Head, and Gordy, and those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; The defts' motion for summary judgment (Doc 17 ) is DENIED as to the pltf's excessive force claim against defts Brown and Cook, and that claim is REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 8/19/20. (MRR, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hudson v. Gordy et al Doc. 21 FILED 2020 Aug-20 AM 08:31 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION TERRANCE A. HUDSON, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN GORDY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:19-cv-00968-AMM-SGC MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on July 14, 2020, recommending the defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part. (Doc. 20). Although advised of their right to do so, no party has filed objections to the report and recommendation. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge’s report is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the court ORDERS that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 17) is GRANTED as to the plaintiff’s claims against defendants Teague, Head, and Gordy, and those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The court further ORDERS that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 17) is DENIED Dockets.Justia.com as to the plaintiff’s excessive force claim against defendants Brown and Cook, and that claim is REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE and ORDERED this 19th day of August, 2020. _________________________________ ANNA M. MANASCO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
