McGhee v. Hale et al, No. 2:2014cv01532 - Document 32 (N.D. Ala. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 7/26/2016. (PSM)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
McGhee v. Hale et al Doc. 32 FILED 2016 Jul-26 AM 11:43 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION FRANKLIN D. McGHEE, Plaintiff, v. MIKE HALE, Sheriff, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:14-cv-01532-LSC-SCG MEMORANDUM OPINION The magistrate judge filed a report on June 15, 2016, recommending that defendant Sheriff Hale’s special report be treated as a motion for summary judgment and further recommending that the motion be granted. (Doc. 31). The magistrate judge also recommended that the plaintiff’s claims against defendant Deputy Davis be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution. Although the parties were advised of their right to file specific written objections within fourteen days, no objections have been received by the court. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge’s report is ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the court ORDERS that Sheriff Hale’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, the court finding no genuine issues of material fact exist. The court further ORDERS Dockets.Justia.com that the plaintiff’s claims against Deputy Davis are DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution. A Final Judgment will be entered. Done and Ordered this 26th day of July 2016. L. SCOTT COOGLER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 182185 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
