Criss v. Assurant Inc. et al, No. 2:2013cv00685 - Document 30 (N.D. Ala. 2014)
Court Description: AMENDMENT to 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as set out herein. Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 6/19/2014. (JLC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Criss v. Assurant Inc. et al Doc. 30 FILED 2014 Jun-19 PM 05:02 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION KAREN CRISS, Plaintiff, v. UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. } } } } } } } } } } CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-0685-WMA AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF JUNE 11, 2014 On pages 8 and 9 of the memorandum opinion and order entered on June 11, 2014, in the section entitled “The Six-Part Test” appears the following sentence: Only if the court determines that the decision was de novo correct does the court go to “step two”, or beyond. The word “correct” was incorrect. “wrong”. The word should have been Accordingly, the word “wrong” is hereby SUBSTITUTED for the word “correct” in the said sentence, and the opinion and order is AMENDED accordingly. DONE this 19th day of June, 2014. _____________________________ WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
