Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Encounter Productions, Inc. et al, No. 2:2013cv00289 - Document 13 (N.D. Ala. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION-re: R&R 12 . The court ADOPTS the Report and ACCEPTS the Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 7/2/2013. (AVC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Encounter Productions, Inc. et al Doc. 13 FILED 2013 Jul-03 AM 08:53 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff vs. ENCOUNTER PRODUCTIONS, INC.; CHRISTIAN MILESKI, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:13-cv-00289-RDP MEMORANDUM OPINION On April 29, 2013, the Magistrate Judge s Report and Recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed by either Plaintiff or Defendants. After careful consideration of the record in this case and the Magistrate Judge s Report and Recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge. The court further ACCEPTS the Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff s Motion for Default Judgment be granted and that a default judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and against Defendant Encounter Productions, Inc. formerly d/b/a Providence Ministries, Inc., for damages in the amount of $318,011.66 as of March 21, 2013, additional prejudgment interest in the amount of $1,689.87 as of April 29, 2013, with additional prejudgment interest Dockets.Justia.com at a rate of $43.33 per day to the date of final judgment, and attorney s fees and costs in the amount of $14,365.95. A separate order in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered. DONE and ORDERED this 2nd day of July, 2013. ___________________________________ R. DAVID PROCTOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
